• <abbr id="88s6a"><source id="88s6a"></source></abbr>
  • <li id="88s6a"><source id="88s6a"></source></li>
    您的位置:首頁(yè) 思潤(rùn)動(dòng)態(tài) 考題回顧

    GRE Argument寫作范文一

    2018-04-25 來(lái)源:思潤(rùn)教育
    閱讀(4587)
    摘要:以下是西安GRE培訓(xùn)班小編為大家整理的gre argument寫作范文,同學(xué)們可以參考一下。

      以下是西安GRE培訓(xùn)班小編為大家整理的gre argument寫作范文,同學(xué)們可以參考一下。


      題目:

      "of the two leading real estate firms in our town---adams realty and fitch realty---adams is clearly superior. adams has 40 real estate agents. in contrast, fitch has 25, many of whom work only part-time. moreover, adams' revenue last year was twice as high as that of fitch, and included home sales that averaged $168,000, compared to fitch's $144,000. homes listed with adams sell faster as well: ten years ago, i listed my home with fitch and it took more than four months to sell; last year, when i sold another home, i listed it with adams, and it took only one month. thus, if you want to sell your home quickly and at a good price, you should use adams."

      范文:

      the author argues that adams realty is superior to fitch realty. to support this claim the author cites statistics about the number and working hours of agents, and the number and sales prices of homes sold by the two farms. further, the author cites anecdotal evidence involving personal experience with fitch and adams. a careful analysis reveals that this evidence it lends little credible support for argument.

      the claim is partially based on the fact that adams has more agents than fitch and that many of fitch's agents work only part-time. there is no correlation between the number of employees, their working hours and the quality of their work. without such a link, we could consider the possibility that a smaller firm could be more effective than a larger one and, likewise, that a part-time agent could be more effective than a full-time agent. besides, the author does not provide any information about the specific number of adams agents who work part-time.

      the claim is also supported by the fact that adams sold more properties than fitch last year. one year of sales records is an insufficient sample. it is possible that in most other years adams could have sold fewer properties than fitch. moreover, the disparity in sales volume could be explained by factors other than the comparative quality of the two firms. for example, perhaps adams serves a denser geographic area or in an area where turnover in home-ownership is higher for reasons unrelated to adams' effectiveness. it is even possible that the only reason sales volume is higher at adams is because the company employs more agents but, perhaps, each adams agent sells fewer homes on average than each fitch agent does. without ruling out such alternative explanations for the disparity in sales volume, the author cannot defend the conclusion based on such scant evidence.

      support for the claim is also drawn from the average sales price of homes. this evidence only illustrates that the homes that adams sells are more valuable on average than the ones that fitch sells, not that adams is more effective in selling homes than fitch. moreover, it is possible that a few relatively high-priced or low-priced properties skewed these averages, rendering any conclusions about the comparative quality of the two firms based on these averages irrelevant.

      the author of the argument indicates that fitch realty took a considerably longer time to sell one of the author's homes than it took adams realty to sell another one of her homes ten years earlier. however, this disparity can be explained by other plausible factor, for example, changing economic conditions during that ten-year period or a difference in the desirability of the two properties. without establishing that all other factors affecting the speed of a sale were essentially the same for the two homes, the author should not expect an audience to make a decision on this limited anecdotal evidence.


    更多西安GRE培訓(xùn)班信息及雅思備考資料獲取,請(qǐng)致電思潤(rùn)培訓(xùn)中心029-85381561或關(guān)注公眾微信號(hào)seeree_edu。

    更多雅思托福提分內(nèi)容,免費(fèi)為你解答! 點(diǎn)擊報(bào)名→
    主站蜘蛛池模板: 午夜福利一区二区三区在线观看| 蜜柚免费视频下载| 亚洲视频你懂的| 久久96国产精品久久久| 午夜免费不卡毛片完整版| 最近中文字幕2018| 久久久久亚洲AV无码专区桃色| 三上悠亚在线观看免费| 日产精品1区至六区有限公司| 67194av| 国产精品无码av在线播放| 日本www.色| 欧美一级黄色片视频| 亚洲av午夜国产精品无码中文字| 北条麻妃中文字幕免观在线| 日韩精品免费一级视频| 精品国产乱码一区二区三区麻豆| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 亚洲欧美中文日韩v在线观看| 久久狠狠高潮亚洲精品| 天堂mv在线看中文字幕| 少妇人妻偷人精品视频| 天海翼一区二区三区四区| 黄色大片网站在线观看| 美女福利视频一区| 亚洲欧美中文字幕高清在线一| 中文字幕日韩精品一区二区三区| 久久久无码精品亚洲日韩蜜桃| 精品一区二区三区在线观看| 国产香蕉精品视频| 国产卡一卡二卡三卡四| 天天影视色香欲性综合网网站| 成人区视频爽爽爽爽爽| 国产综合色在线视频区| 欧美线在线精品观看视频| 99re视频在线播放| 国产成人亚洲综合无| 娇妻之欲海泛舟1一42| 亚洲乱码一二三四区国产| 中文字幕中出在线| 女性特黄一级毛片|